Board logo

标题: 假加盖,可惜了一枚好票! [打印本页]

作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-5 12:32     标题: 假加盖,可惜了一枚好票!

复件 78973024A.jpg 复件 78973024B.jpg

上图是一枚假加盖:

票面上销戳应是“山东龙泉民国三十六年一月”, 对比目录上此票加盖改值时间(1948年6月)提早了一年多!再看1947年1月(民国36年)邮资800元是不可能的,山东解放区邮资表1947年(民国36年)8月1日双挂号的邮资才25元,何来800元的邮资。
再细看这票,销戳跟票一样陈旧,底票应该是真的,加盖却是假的!无知的作假,浪费了一张销36年佳戳的好票!
下图是我收藏的加盖四方连:


复件 邮票044.jpg

图片附件: 复件 78973024A.jpg (2013-1-5 12:22, 61.26 KB) / 下载次数 29
http://p1878.com/BbS/attachment.php?aid=655608&k=d2a50b752022909b4937011720c4fa84&t=1732725717&sid=CVhaH1



图片附件: 复件 78973024B.jpg (2013-1-5 12:22, 43.85 KB) / 下载次数 21
http://p1878.com/BbS/attachment.php?aid=655609&k=9c85ce532b61fb287229de3640939415&t=1732725717&sid=CVhaH1



图片附件: 复件 邮票044.jpg (2013-1-5 12:29, 231.3 KB) / 下载次数 29
http://p1878.com/BbS/attachment.php?aid=655610&k=29191d7ae1c61010932fe1a7b8d6ae41&t=1732725717&sid=CVhaH1


作者: 麦国培    时间: 2013-1-5 12:53

是不是三十八年?
作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-5 15:13

是不是三十八年?
麦国培 发表于 2013-1-5 12:53


2222.jpg

确认是三十六年!麦哥请看!

图片附件: 2222.jpg (2013-1-5 15:11, 9.31 KB) / 下载次数 23
http://p1878.com/BbS/attachment.php?aid=655673&k=96a8f0c839a8e0f4f73af496ec9c04ca&t=1732725717&sid=CVhaH1


作者: 麦国培    时间: 2013-1-5 15:20

看来是了
作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-6 06:25

Good article, thank you.  Nice block of 4!

If you take a closer view (without comparing other criteria) you will notice the fake overprint was made with a water based black color and not with the oily based black color which leave a yellow fatty impression around the overprint.

I add this comment because someone might be saying the overprint is genuine but the cancel is wrong


作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-6 08:20

Good article, thank you.  Nice block of 4!

If you take a closer view (without comparing other  ...
Hsinyen 发表于 2013-1-6 06:25

Thank you for your support. The area of Mr. ticket deep I admire! Can see the back of the oil based black is because the paper is very thin, it becomes a means of identification. I have used this method of identification, but the premise is to the tissue paper! Please look at my blog article:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_8239a188010136o5.html


作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-6 09:04

Very interesting blog (an nice music)! Thank you for sharing. I will read it now

About your comparsion of the stamp with the damanged "暫" please take a look on this block of six. The overprint was obviously made through a chop of two (or four).


作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-6 10:06

本帖最后由 小卢 于 2013-1-6 10:09 编辑
Very interesting blog (an nice music)! Thank you for sharing. I will read it now

About ...
Hsinyen 发表于 2013-1-6 09:04

Good six parties even, I very love! From the figure, I think 2 is a group of more likely to die a little! The following is my collection of a group of stamp, please enjoy!

参展邮集贴片054.jpg



图片附件: 参展邮集贴片054.jpg (2013-1-6 10:05, 384.45 KB) / 下载次数 21
http://p1878.com/BbS/attachment.php?aid=655847&k=fa4c2d9ebfa2059eed5a8321cf08f733&t=1732725717&sid=CVhaH1


作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-7 06:59

Thank you for sharing!

I like to see you have the stamps real used, often more hard to get as mint!




欢迎光临 华邮网 (http://p1878.com/BbS/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2