Board logo

标题: Open Questions [打印本页]
作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-12 06:52     标题: Open Questions

Dear Readers,

I have some open questions and hope someone might be help me

This stamp I found in an old collection, it looks like as a revenue stamp from Liberated Area which were issued in blue (bit bigger in a more detailled design). I was told this one might be a bogus / forgery, but without any background information. In the catalogue from H.C. PAAU (Revenue stamps from Liberated Area) from 1987 he mention on page 9 a black "proof" might exits.

Maybe someone has more information?


作者: 麦国培    时间: 2013-1-12 09:35

估计是后做的，臆造
作者: 名驹拙成    时间: 2013-1-12 10:14

现在漫画版
作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-12 10:23

I help you translate into Chinese, hope to see some people to help you!
我帮他翻译成中文希望他能得到答案：
    我有一些疑问，希望有人能帮助我！我发现这张邮票在一个古老的集子里，它看起来像是解放区邮票发行的，蓝色。我被告知这一可能是一个虚假、伪造的，但没有任何背景资料。在目录（慧聪paau印花税票，解放区）1987第9页提到！请知道的人提供更多的信息！
作者: 麦国培    时间: 2013-1-12 10:35

这种印花己出现二三十年了
有人当真但大多当假
作者: 戳迷    时间: 2013-1-12 10:51

呵呵估计要打英文楼主才看得懂！！一个字Dummy
作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-12 11:26

我是一个德国人。但是，当我开始写在德国，我相信没有人会真正理解。我可以读一些中国的语言，但不幸的是，我可以不写。请道歉。@小卢  谢谢你的帮助。

The case is not so easy. Maybe bogus, but for what and why?

作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-12 11:37

本帖最后由 小卢 于 2013-1-12 11:41 编辑

我理解！估计到你会看中文却不会写！也感谢你，希望以后能从你这里学到更多的知识！
作者: 麦国培    时间: 2013-1-12 11:55

欢迎德国的朋友
5c的那一张我觉得有可能是真的。
这些票存在二三十年或以上了
作者: g153694    时间: 2013-1-12 18:42

都是真的,在八十年代首版区票目录上有载,笫2版区票目录就去掉了,
我手中曾有过几套,那时价廉,纸质很薄,目前已很多年末见过,
可惜俞炳森等早去
作者: 小卢    时间: 2013-1-12 21:36

终于从郭老这里得到答案了！ @g153694 said: these stamps are really! In the eighty's first edition of the Jiefang District stamp catalogue on the records, but in a two edition of the Jiefang District stamp catalogue will remove these records, I once had several sets of the stamps, the stamp price is very low, paper thin, but these stamps have for many years not to see.
作者: 我要区票    时间: 2013-1-12 23:56

This one also recorded in "The Revenue Stamps of Communist China 1929-195", 1975 edition
by Mr Padget, no.:　E3
Really hard to call it is a genuine one or fake, but I trust that it is a fake one since we do not have any significant evidence up to now
to prove it as a genuine. And later catalog publish in China had withdraw it, perhaps the editor leave it as no comment? I will leave it as BOB.

@#5 同意麦会的说法
作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-13 07:41

Thank you for your help. As long new evidence coming out I will define it as BOGUS now. For a forgery it is too far away from any existing stamp
作者: Hsinyen    时间: 2013-1-13 07:51

I have another unsolved problem. This overprinted stamps should part of the Liberated Area (廬山區 issue) based on the book "Silver Currency Stamps" from William Jones 1985.

Does anybody have further information?


作者: g153694    时间: 2013-1-13 08:12

本帖最后由 g153694 于 2013-1-13 08:17 编辑
终于从郭老这里得到答案了！ @g153694 said: these stamps are really! In the eighty's first edition of  ...
小卢 发表于 2013-1-12 21:36



    文革后百业重新，八十年代新出的区票目录此票载入，出版该区票目录时，大部份老集邮家还健在，第2版再版时此票去掉了，并不是因为假票去掉，而因为是属印花税不属区票而去掉的。
八十年代“杨乃强”目录也载入，后耒就去掉了
作者: 我要区票    时间: 2013-1-13 13:50

回复 15# g153694


   多谢郭老指教！学习了。 但杨目98年版也去掉啦，而很多老前辈也说这枚是假票.....相信谁 ？我是把这枚列为参考票。



欢迎光临 华邮网 (http://p1878.com/bbS/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2