假加盖，可惜了一枚好票！ 可惜了

小卢

下载 (61.26 KB)

2013-1-5 12:22

下载 (43.85 KB)

2013-1-5 12:22

上图是一枚假加盖：

票面上销戳应是“山东龙泉民国三十六年一月”， 对比目录上此票加盖改值时间（1948年6月）提早了一年多！再看1947年1月（民国36年）邮资800元是不可能的，山东解放区邮资表1947年（民国36年）8月1日双挂号的邮资才25元，何来800元的邮资。
再细看这票，销戳跟票一样陈旧，底票应该是真的，加盖却是假的！无知的作假，浪费了一张销36年佳戳的好票！
下图是我收藏的加盖四方连：

下载 (231.3 KB)

2013-1-5 12:29

Hsinyen

Thank you for sharing!

I like to see you have the stamps real used, often more hard to get as mint!

小卢

Very interesting blog (an nice music)! Thank you for sharing. I will read it now

About ...
Hsinyen 发表于 2013-1-6 09:04

Good six parties even, I very love! From the figure, I think 2 is a group of more likely to die a little! The following is my collection of a group of stamp, please enjoy!

下载 (384.45 KB)

2013-1-6 10:05

Hsinyen

Very interesting blog (an nice music)! Thank you for sharing. I will read it now

About your comparsion of the stamp with the damanged "暫" please take a look on this block of six. The overprint was obviously made through a chop of two (or four).

小卢

Good article, thank you.  Nice block of 4!

If you take a closer view (without comparing other  ...
Hsinyen 发表于 2013-1-6 06:25

Thank you for your support. The area of Mr. ticket deep I admire! Can see the back of the oil based black is because the paper is very thin, it becomes a means of identification. I have used this method of identification, but the premise is to the tissue paper! Please look at my blog article:http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_8239a188010136o5.html

Hsinyen

Good article, thank you.  Nice block of 4!

If you take a closer view (without comparing other criteria) you will notice the fake overprint was made with a water based black color and not with the oily based black color which leave a yellow fatty impression around the overprint.

I add this comment because someone might be saying the overprint is genuine but the cancel is wrong

麦国培

看来是了

小卢

是不是三十八年？
麦国培 发表于 2013-1-5 12:53

下载 (9.31 KB)

2013-1-5 15:11

确认是三十六年！麦哥请看！

麦国培

是不是三十八年？