三枚票有多大差别 约翰

卢长春

<p>以下分别是布约翰第307次拍卖中的第191号、192号、197号拍品。除品相外还有什么差别？我没看出来，请教各位。</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>

下载 (13.85 KB)
三枚票有多大差别

2008-6-4 00:20

</p>
<p><br/>&nbsp;</p>

下载 (15.04 KB)
三枚票有多大差别

2008-6-4 00:20

<br/>

下载 (17.17 KB)
三枚票有多大差别

2008-6-4 00:20

<br/>

卢长春

不懂，进来学习。

大龙

QUOTE:

以下是引用dowager1894在2008-7-25 11:25:37的发言：
I viewed the three Dowager narraw space surcharge 30 c on 24 cn stamps held by John Bull auction on 14 to 15 June 2008.

Lot #191, claimed to be first printing with a famous philatelist chop Mr. F.Z. Chen, is actually 3rd print.

Lot #192 is first print. This stamp was offered by Shreves Auction in the States on 30 Sep 2005 and was sold at USD75,000 plus 15% commission to a famous Stamp company, mystic Stamps, in the States. It was then re-offered in Zurich Asia's Auction in HK on 28 June 2007 and was sold at HKD650,000 + 15%.

Lot #197 is, no doubt, a 3rd print.

I talked with Mr. Ian Hui of John Bull after the auction and learnt that all three stamps were unsold. There were open bid for these stamps and, in fact, the reserve price. No body submitted a bid and the stamps were called back.

Lot 192, Mystic paid US$86000 for this one stamp via telephone, at the Shreves Auction "Shanghai collection".

The entire Shanghai Collection was housed in only one album. Loaded with all the goodies, it was amazing. 

Anything else sold at that "Shanghai Collection" in 2005, are selling for much more now, in 2009.

The small 4c RR in the same John Bull sale, was also purchased by Mystic at the Shreves sale. 



 

卢长春

谢谢先生将此说明。但英文看不懂。

dowager1894

I viewed the three Dowager narraw space surcharge 30 c on 24 cn stamps held by John Bull auction on 14 to 15 June 2008.

Lot #191, claimed to be first printing with a famous philatelist chop Mr. F.Z. Chen, is actually 3rd print.

Lot #192 is first print. This stamp was offered by Shreves Auction in the States on 30 Sep 2005 and was sold at USD75,000 plus 15% commission to a famous Stamp company, mystic Stamps, in the States. It was then re-offered in Zurich Asia's Auction in HK on 28 June 2007 and was sold at HKD650,000 + 15%.

Lot #197 is, no doubt, a 3rd print.

I talked with Mr. Ian Hui of John Bull after the auction and learnt that all three stamps were unsold. There were open bid for these stamps and, in fact, the reserve price. No body submitted a bid and the stamps were called back.

麦国培

谢谢老兄关心！

卢长春

也得休息休息，休息好才能工作好，哈哈。

麦国培

那有什么休息，只是有家事要处理而已！

卢长春

QUOTE:

以下是引用麦国培在2008-6-29 16:22:21的发言：
应以拍卖行成交单为准。

还没休息到两天就回来了。

麦国培

应以拍卖行成交单为准。

卢长春

QUOTE:

以下是引用edward在2008-6-22 16:33:39的发言：
我有在現場，這三枚票沒有流標（unsold），為何網上結果沒有顯示？

是不是没达到卖方与拍卖公司另行协商的价格？有时目录上的估价是为了吸引买者参加竞拍的。

麦国培

关注，也希望田兄拍品能卖出善价！

edward

多謝提點，要看看。

davidshao

QUOTE:

以下是引用edward在2008-6-22 16:33:39的发言：
我有在現場，這三枚票沒有流標（unsold），為何網上結果沒有顯示？

  看来这个网上拍卖结果确实是有问题的了，田兄您也最好与拍卖公司联系下，看看您的独虎票成交价格会否弄错了？

edward

我有在現場，這三枚票沒有流標（unsold），為何網上結果沒有顯示？

davidshao

我不知道这个网上公布的拍卖结果是否正确，因为有许多拍品，比如有许多单枚红印花估价极低，但是却全部没有拍卖成交记录，难道是流标？？？

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-22 16:29:36编辑过]

davidshao

此3枚票查拍卖结果，好象是全部流标。

卢长春

QUOTE:

以下是引用小马哥在2008-6-8 0:17:33的发言：

钻不进去.

暂时没这水平

悄悄告诉你：我也没这水平！喜好而已。

小马哥

钻不进去.

暂时没这水平

卢长春

的确存在如此现象。